Legal Aptitude Quiz-11
Legal Aptitude is an important subject in CLAT,DULLB & Other Law Exams. In any of law exam, legal aptitude carries weightage of 25 % of questions. With focused practice good marks can be fetched from this section. These questions are very important in achieving your success in CLAT, DULLB and Other Law Exams..
Q1. Indian Criminal Laws are divided into three major acts i.e.
Solution
Indian Penal Code 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 & Indian Evidence Act 1872 are the basic criminal legislations of India.
Indian Penal Code 1860, Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 & Indian Evidence Act 1872 are the basic criminal legislations of India.
Q2. One of the remedies for false imprisonment is:
Solution
By the writ of Habeas corpus, the Supreme Court under Article 32 or High Court under Article 226 can cause any person who has been detained or imprisoned in violation of his fundamental right to liberty, to be physically brought before the court. The court then examines the reason of his detention and if there is no legal justification of his detention, he can be set free.
By the writ of Habeas corpus, the Supreme Court under Article 32 or High Court under Article 226 can cause any person who has been detained or imprisoned in violation of his fundamental right to liberty, to be physically brought before the court. The court then examines the reason of his detention and if there is no legal justification of his detention, he can be set free.
Q3. Which of the following is not a valid defense in tort?
Solution
Defenses in tort include Volenti non fit injuria, Vis Major or Act of God and Inevitable Accident.
Defenses in tort include Volenti non fit injuria, Vis Major or Act of God and Inevitable Accident.
Q4. Maintenance under section 125 Cr.P.C cannot be claimed by:
Solution
Defenses in tort include Volenti non fit injuria, Vis Major or Act of God and Inevitable Accident.
Defenses in tort include Volenti non fit injuria, Vis Major or Act of God and Inevitable Accident.
Q5. Which one of the following is not a libel?
Solution
Libel is a method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person’s reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business or profession.
Libel is a method of defamation expressed by print, writing, pictures, signs, effigies, or any communication embodied in physical form that is injurious to a person’s reputation, exposes a person to public hatred, contempt or ridicule, or injures a person in his/her business or profession.
Q6. If Criminal procedure code provides the procedure to be followed in:
Solution
Criminal procedure code provides the procedure to be followed for criminal trial, inquiries and investigations.
Criminal procedure code provides the procedure to be followed for criminal trial, inquiries and investigations.
Q7. Where a corporation enters into a contract beyond the scope of the object, such
contract is said:
contract is said:
Solution
Criminal procedure code provides the procedure to be followed for criminal trial, inquiries and investigations.
Criminal procedure code provides the procedure to be followed for criminal trial, inquiries and investigations.
Q8. Active concealment of the fact’ is associated with which one of the following:
Solution
Fraud under Indian Contract Act includes the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact.
Fraud under Indian Contract Act includes the active concealment of a fact by one having knowledge or belief of the fact.
Q9. Fundamental duties have been provided in of the constitution.
Solution
Fundamental Duties borrowed from USSR are provided under Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.
Fundamental Duties borrowed from USSR are provided under Part IV-A of the Constitution of India.
Q10. The basis of doctrine of frustration is:
Solution
Doctrine of Frustration may be defined as the occurrence of an intervening event or change of circumstances so fundamental as to be regarded by the law both striking at the root of the agreement, and as entirely beyond what was contemplated by the parties when they entered into the agreement. If an event which could not be foreseen by both parties supervenes, frustration would apply.
Doctrine of Frustration may be defined as the occurrence of an intervening event or change of circumstances so fundamental as to be regarded by the law both striking at the root of the agreement, and as entirely beyond what was contemplated by the parties when they entered into the agreement. If an event which could not be foreseen by both parties supervenes, frustration would apply.
